Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: sirchtruth
When you learn what the word 'classified' means, come back and we'll talk.

The guy said plainly that the reason he didn't bring an 'outing' charge is that he couldn't reasonably make a determination whether the - read this part carefully - revelation of CLASSIFIED information about Plame's employment was intentional, inadvertent, etc. And he said plainly that one of the reasons he couldn't make that determination is because Libby constructed a cover story to hide what actually happened.

A prosecutor with less restraint could take two little pieces - the 'non-secure phone' comment and the need to lie to cover-up what happened - and fairly make the argument that Libby INTENTIONALLY revealed the classified information.

3,174 posted on 10/29/2005 5:43:09 AM PDT by lugsoul
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3171 | View Replies ]


To: lugsoul
and fairly make the argument that Libby INTENTIONALLY revealed the classified information.

But "classified" is not covert, and according to the guy who helped author the '82 (?) law I heard on WBAL interview yesterday, plainly said this law could in no way be applyied to this case as well as Fitz himself stated, his investigation concluded NO ONE OUTTED A COVERT AGENT...

There is no way on the face this earth she could have been outed! Fitz knew this, so his Classified comment was B.S.

3,179 posted on 10/29/2005 6:15:02 AM PDT by sirchtruth (Words Mean Things...)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3174 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson