To: jwalsh07
And now a question that's been bothering me for quite some time. Why would the CIA bureaucracy, obviously "outraged" at the "outing" of one of their "classified" employees, send that employees husband on a politically charged "covert" mission to Niger if they were so damned concerned about his wife being exposed to the press? Why no non-disclosure statement? Why not use an official in place that was actually associated with Niger? Why consider a professional wife of an actual U.S. Ambassador covert - she'd be outed as soon as anyone looked at him, much less her.
3,043 posted on
10/28/2005 1:39:11 PM PDT by
lepton
("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
To: lepton
More things I wonder about.
And one more.
How come the best and the brightest in the MSM don't wonder about the same things I do?
To: lepton
she'd be outed as soon as anyone looked at him, much less her. Especially when he writes an article in The New Yor Times
3,049 posted on
10/28/2005 1:41:14 PM PDT by
Mo1
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson