Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BigSkyFreeper
This whole thing is a mess.

Yes, it is. I heard some talking heads on one of the news channels asking why Libby would lie to the FBI and Grand Jury when it was clear that there was documentation otherwise. I guess he could argue on exactly what "knew she worked at the CIA" means, ie. he never saw her employee badge, but that's Clintonesque.

I guess he thought that he could deflect the FBI investigation and that it would blow over. Once he tried to do that, he couldn't contradict his FBI statements in the later Grand Jury. Still, the guy's no dummy, he had to know that all the details would be found out.

3,028 posted on 10/28/2005 1:26:16 PM PDT by mikegi
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3010 | View Replies ]


To: mikegi
Here is what I am confused on:

Was he being asked when he found out Wilson's wife worked at the CIA and from whom, or was he being asked when he found out what her name was, and from whom? I ask this because I thought initially the question was about when was her name (as Valeria Plame) actually passed on, not just the fact that she worked at the CIA. Of course, this all gets back to the initial charge of the investigation of outing a covert agent, which never happened.
3,035 posted on 10/28/2005 1:32:11 PM PDT by jennyjenny
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3028 | View Replies ]

To: mikegi
I guess he could argue on exactly what "knew she worked at the CIA" means, ie. he never saw her employee badge, but that's Clintonesque.

Well, no it isn't. There are people who work for the CIA openly; there are people that work for the CIA quietly; and there are actual deep cover agents. It is not even remotely illegal to tell people about the first; only in extreme circumstances illegal for the second; and only sometimes illegal to tell people about the third. ...And knowingly telling that they are part of the third group is only illegal under certain circumstances.

Regardless, the law that protects the identity of a deep cover agent is NOT intended to act as a shield against their participation in a lie such as Wilson made in misattributing why he went to Niger. Her name was a direct answer to a point of the debate, and she was not in a physical location where she was under the unprotected control of a foreign country - which is what the law was about.

3,037 posted on 10/28/2005 1:34:45 PM PDT by lepton ("It is useless to attempt to reason a man out of a thing he was never reasoned into"--Jonathan Swift)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 3028 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson