Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
To: counterpunch
2 posted on
10/27/2005 2:43:27 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: counterpunch
No. Self determination. remember?
To: counterpunch
She might of would of if she could of, but she won't!
4 posted on
10/27/2005 2:44:15 PM PDT by
Revolting cat!
("In the end, nothing explains anything.")
To: counterpunch
It's also beside the point. Miers is gone.
Now you're just showing off.
5 posted on
10/27/2005 2:44:19 PM PDT by
sinkspur
(Trust, but vilify.)
To: counterpunch
6 posted on
10/27/2005 2:44:38 PM PDT by
My2Cents
(Dead people voting is the closest the Democrats come to believing in eternal life.)
To: counterpunch
I seem to recall a case about beating a dead horse. Glad that Miers is out of the picture...but the focus now is whether Bush will nominate another lib (Gonzales) or a conservative (Brown, McConnell, Luttig et al.).
7 posted on
10/27/2005 2:44:38 PM PDT by
peyton randolph
(Warning! It is illegal to fatwah a camel in all 50 states)
To: counterpunch
8 posted on
10/27/2005 2:44:50 PM PDT by
Hank Rearden
(Never allow anyone who could only get a government job attempt to tell you how to run your life.)
To: counterpunch
Would Miers have Voted to Overturn Roe? Thankfully, we'll never need to find out.
To: counterpunch
The reality is - what does it matter now.
13 posted on
10/27/2005 2:47:29 PM PDT by
svcw
To: counterpunch
Fortunately, her potential votes are no longer relevant.
15 posted on
10/27/2005 2:50:02 PM PDT by
American Quilter
(Why doesn't the government have to pay taxes on its income?)
To: counterpunch
18 posted on
10/27/2005 2:51:37 PM PDT by
steveo
(Member: Fathers Against Rude Television)
To: counterpunch
This is what is known as a moot point.
19 posted on
10/27/2005 2:52:57 PM PDT by
DaGman
To: counterpunch
20 posted on
10/27/2005 2:53:28 PM PDT by
BigSkyFreeper
("Tucker Carlson could reveal himself as a castrated, lesbian, rodeo clown ...wouldn't surprise me")
To: counterpunch
One can endlessly debate whether she'd have voted to overturn that decision, but there's little doubt that even if she did it wouldn't be for the correct reasons.
Roe is just a symptom.
21 posted on
10/27/2005 2:53:37 PM PDT by
thoughtomator
(Liberals: Get your human shields lined up quick or you'll miss the bombing!)
To: counterpunch
24 posted on
10/27/2005 2:55:34 PM PDT by
xcamel
(No more RINOS - Not Now, Not Ever Again.)
To: counterpunch
irrelevant now.
27 posted on
10/27/2005 2:57:42 PM PDT by
FFIGHTER
(Character Matters!)
To: counterpunch
The fact she was childless bothered me a little on the Roe issue...
29 posted on
10/27/2005 2:59:10 PM PDT by
tubebender
(Chris Matthews suffers from "IRRATIONAL EXUBERANCE"...)
To: counterpunch
Harriet Miers is a fine woman and public servant. Let's leave her alone now.
30 posted on
10/27/2005 2:59:41 PM PDT by
Buck W.
(Yesterday's Intelligentsia are today's Irrelevantsia.)
To: counterpunch
To: counterpunch
The answer:
39 posted on
10/27/2005 3:07:31 PM PDT by
Momaw Nadon
("...with the ultimate goal of ending tyranny in our world.")
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-20, 21-29 next last
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson