To: AdamSelene235
If this speech accurately reflects her views, I can confidently predict without even the smallest chance of being wrong, that she will
never be a Supreme Court nominee, and even if she were, a snowflake has a better channce in a blast furnace than she does in actually being confirmed.
That, I think, is a terrible shame.
42 posted on
10/27/2005 11:24:51 AM PDT by
zeugma
(Warning: Self-referential object does not reference itself.)
To: zeugma
Agree, but a true conservative president would still nominate her as she may be the best choice available as a Constitutionalist and a "TRUE CONSERVATIVE".
By NOT nominating J.R.B., Bush proved twice (with Roberts and Miers) that Bush is NOT a true conservative.
Bush will avoid J.R.B. this third time. J.R.B. is a proud TRUE CONSERVATIVE--George Bush is NOT a conservative, proven by his avoidance to nominate such a worthy true conservative as J.R.B.
47 posted on
10/27/2005 11:33:13 AM PDT by
Dont_Tread_On_Me_888
(Bush's #1 priority Africa. #2 priority appease Fox and Mexico . . . USA priority #64.)
To: zeugma
If this speech accurately reflects her views, I can confidently predict without even the smallest chance of being wrong, that she will never be a Supreme Court nominee, and even if she were, a snowflake has a better channce in a blast furnace than she does in actually being confirmed. I just want to see her work the room during the confirmation hearings.
"We know not what miracles may happen; what heroic possibilities exist. We may be only moments away from a new dawn."
89 posted on
10/27/2005 7:28:05 PM PDT by
Aquamarine
(If the Constitution is living and breathing chances are over 30 percent of the unborn won't be.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson