Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Trust but Verify

Because some things are worth fighting for, win or lose.


88 posted on 10/27/2005 6:30:16 AM PDT by WatchOutForSnakes
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 30 | View Replies ]


To: WatchOutForSnakes
I agree. Although Miers was an unlikely choice for the Supremes, she should of been given a chance to prove herself one way or the other in the hearings. The president now has to deal from a position of weakness knowing that whomever he selects was not his first choice for the job. If he wasn't going to stand up for Miers he shouldn't have nominated her.
111 posted on 10/27/2005 6:35:53 AM PDT by blaquebyrd
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

To: WatchOutForSnakes

you're right, it is worth fighting for, but if you do not have to go looking for confrontation. My objection to Harriet Miers is that there are many other far more qualified candidates. There are very conservative candidates that are highly qualified that can be confirmed without things going nuclear. That is the path Bush needs to take now.


116 posted on 10/27/2005 6:36:56 AM PDT by Trust but Verify (( ))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson