Then you miss the Conservative position on these issues ~ when it comes to fundamental human rights, e.g. the right of a kid to live, the right of a kid to have parents (of different sexes), and so forth, it's insufficient for a candidate for the USSC to be expected to allow states to do whatever they wish.
Like I said, the woman is a Libertarian ~ you can tell that by reading all of her published decisions. None of you can be trusted by Conservatives.
Then you miss the Conservative position on these issues ~ when it comes to fundamental human rights, e.g. the right of a kid to live, the right of a kid to have parents (of different sexes), and so forth, it's insufficient for a candidate for the USSC to be expected to allow states to do whatever they wish.Attitudes like yours are exactly why we have legal abortion in all states. How could you logically defend a federal ban on abortions without conceding that Roe v. Wade is unconstitutional?
When you start ignoring the Constitution, even for conservative means, you go down an extremely dangerous road.