To: flashbunny
It had nothing to do with her being an evangelical. Get the chip off your shoulder. See my sig line - it's over. Deal with it.
You want to forget after you murdered the baby, but in part it did have to do with her being an Evangelical. I am simply laying out the results, which you don't like. You were the one with the chip on your shoulder in attacking her.
2,670 posted on
10/27/2005 12:52:31 PM PDT by
GarySpFc
(Sneakypete, De Oppresso Liber)
To: GarySpFc
" You want to forget after you murdered the baby, but in part it did have to do with her being an Evangelical"
Either you are delusional or you're making excuses. The ONLY time her evangelical religion entered into this is when the white house make it some kind of qualification. THEY are the ones who started it, and you seem to be ticked off that everybody didn't drop what they were doing and say "gee, since she's an evangelical, she belongs on the supreme court".
Like I said, it's over. She failed as a nominee for many reasons, but her being an evangelical was not one of them. That's just a lame excuse.
2,682 posted on
10/27/2005 12:57:02 PM PDT by
flashbunny
(Miers has withdrawn. You can stop spinning for her. It's ok to admit she was a bad pick.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson