Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: betty boop; AmishDude; Alamo-Girl; marron

I agree that the costs of a filibuster must go up. However, if the intent of the McCain 11 is to prevent a nominee from reaching the floor and not simply to prevent changing the filibuster rule, then they will not support a 24/7 filibuster either.


2,555 posted on 10/27/2005 11:57:44 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2342 | View Replies ]


To: xzins; Alamo-Girl; Cboldt; AmishDude; marron
...if the intent of the McCain 11 is to prevent a nominee from reaching the floor and not simply to prevent changing the filibuster rule, then they will not support a 24/7 filibuster either.

Then effectively, the presidential appointment power has been usurped by Senator McCain and the rest of his cabal. I had thought that the Constitution invests the President with this power, and it is a plenipotential power. That is, he shares it with no one. The Senate's role is to advise and consent, exercising that role by a simple majoritarian, direct, straight up-or-down vote of the entire Senate. Since when does the power of a Senate committee trump the clear language and meaning of the Constitution?

2,605 posted on 10/27/2005 12:15:31 PM PDT by betty boop (Nature loves to hide. -- Heraclitus)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2555 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson