Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: clawrence3

Whoa! You may not have followed the thread to see what my post was about. The comment I replied to was that the withdrawl would mean O'Connor on some big decisions coming up. Unless there is a case within the next couple of months that would have overturned Roe v. Wade, the downside doesn't extend to babies. The better likelihood is that you can have a reliable anti-abortion vote in a truly well qualified Justice around when the issue comes up over the long term, who will also rule right on everything else.


2,378 posted on 10/27/2005 11:11:37 AM PDT by JewishRighter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1725 | View Replies ]


To: JewishRighter
See Gonzales v. Carhart http://www.usdoj.gov/osg/briefs/2005/2pet/7pet/2005-0380.pet.aa.html
2,403 posted on 10/27/2005 11:15:00 AM PDT by clawrence3
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2378 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson