Don't get all snippy with me about "technically" qualified, you're the one being pedantic.
What is "qualified?" How about a dazzling grasp of constitutional law, for one thing?
I define that as Nino Scalia or John Roberts.
Beyond being qualified, they should also btw be politically conservative (at least conservative enough to be pro-life) and jurisprudentially originalist.
Fine - you try getting that ideal nominee confirmed in the U.S. Senate.