Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Alamo-Girl

You make a sobering point: perhaps this will put a stealth Souter onto the court.

Nonetheless, I still think it makes sense to demonstrate what the real republican senatorial support looks like. I'm pretty sure that there are 11 who will not support a hardline approach to this nomination.

That means we get......something moderate?


2,114 posted on 10/27/2005 10:10:24 AM PDT by xzins (Retired Army Chaplain and Proud of It!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2061 | View Replies ]


To: xzins
Nonetheless, I still think it makes sense to demonstrate what the real republican senatorial support looks like. I'm pretty sure that there are 11 who will not support a hardline approach to this nomination.

That means we get......something moderate?

And it will still be blamed on President Bush, even though this would be the Senate failing to support a constructioinist. He's darned if he does, darned if he doesn't.


If you want a Google GMail account, FReepmail me.

2,222 posted on 10/27/2005 10:34:56 AM PDT by rdb3 (Have you ever stopped to think, but forgot to start again?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2114 | View Replies ]

To: xzins
I'm pretty sure that there are 11 who will not support a hardline approach to this nomination.

That means we get......something moderate?

Indeed. Stealth conservatives are probably off the list now. And open conservatives will not be able to get past a filibuster.

In the end, IMHO, it will be an apparent moderate who will tilt one way or the other once on the Court.

2,226 posted on 10/27/2005 10:35:25 AM PDT by Alamo-Girl
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2114 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson