Replies

I really think the Pro-Miers crowd is confused. There were a small percentage of pro-life people who argued against Miers because they didn't feel she was pro-life ENOUGH. But I believe abortion was NOT the issue (nor SHOULD it be). If we get an originalist, we get someone who will overturn Roe - we're all happy - social conservatives, moderates AND Republicans. Do you have proof Miers was an originalist?

Simply being "pro-life" isn't enough for me to stand behind a nominee. Heck, hasn't SDO said she's pro-life?

It's not about abortion - it's about that lovely piece of paper we call the Constitution. And for FReepers on here reducing this to simply about abortion - you are playing RIGHT into the DAMN MSM's hands.

It's not about abortion! K?

It's not about abortion - it's about that lovely piece of paper we call the Constitution.

I'd like to believe that President Bush thinks that, too, but I'm not at all sure.

It seemed like James Dobson was sent out to send the message "she's a bible believing Christian, she'll rule against Roe and be a good justice because she has the right personal beliefs", nudge nudge wink wink.

I'm all for bible believing Christians, but it scares me if that was the president's thought process. We just want a justice who will uphold the constitution! Is that too much to ask?