When you get honest with yourself, then we can talk. That may be what YOUR own opposition was based on, but others dissed her education, her looks, her intelligence, her career in corporate law, even -- as you can see on this very thread -- her sexuality. I have seen people on these threads call her a pig. I saved that particular post somewhere. I have to get to work now, but later will find that post and send it to you.
Then you can tell me again how the opposition was based only on her supposed lack of credentials.
I'm being perfectly honest with both myself and you. What has stuck in your craw are the unfair attacks, but they constitute a small minority of the opposition. You do yourself and us a disservice by dismissing the principled opposition on the basis of arguments we would not make. This isn't a Soviet here where dissenters can be silenced and crushed to make sure they're "on message".