Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Wolfstar
There will be no reunification.

LOL........I was laughing about that to myself; they just assume we'd all fall in line.

Oh, they "won" this round; but I'm not sure they realize what the "prize" is going to be. :-)

1,352 posted on 10/27/2005 8:00:52 AM PDT by Howlin
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1336 | View Replies ]


To: Howlin

Two comments this AM before work:

1) O'Conner will now hear and decide on the Church&State and Parental Notification cases. I doubt this forum will reach consensus on who might be responsible for whatever results come from that. Great opportunities for SDO'C to write swan-song majority opinions.

2) I do hope this forum combines with the pundits and the next nominee to apply pressure where it belongs, with all the vehemence we have seen for the last few weeks: the Senate. There lies the source of weakness that the President took into account with the Mier's nomination. Already Trent Lott was on screen signalling that 'very conservative' nominees (by name, Owens or Brown) might not be the 'wisest' choices, implying that the constitutional option is not a done deal at all.


1,391 posted on 10/27/2005 8:05:42 AM PDT by GopherIt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin

If the "prize" is seeing people like you leave the GOP, threaten away--I bet we'll all lose a lot of sleep over that. Maybe a wink, total. We wouldn't lose anything, because the only time you RINOs 'fall in line' for conservatives is to screw us on close votes in Congress and beg for handouts from your RNC pals. We'll get along fine without you RINO booby prizes. I don't know a soul around here who misses Lowell Weicker.


1,488 posted on 10/27/2005 8:17:36 AM PDT by LibertarianInExile (Miers did the right thing. Now the President can, by appointing Alex Kozinski, 9th Circuit COA.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Howlin, they didn't win anything. Not this round. Nothing. The damage they have wrought goes far beyond Ms. Miers and beyond this presidency. The precedent has been set that only people with these elite sorts of background are suitable for the Court:

She was graduated from Cornell University, and then attended Harvard and Columbia Law Schools. She taught law at Rutgers and Columbia Universities. She became a clerk for a U.S. district judge and taught law, becoming the first female tenured professor at Columbia School of Law. She then became a judge on the U.S. Court of Appeals, a position she held until she was appointed to the Supreme Court.

Who is she? Ruth Bader Ginsberg. Those throwing around complaints that Harriet Miers did not have just such a background have now set a precedent in which nominees for the court must ONLY a background such as Ms. Ginsberg's. Although the Court was graced with many, many "common" people in its history, it never will be again.

1,604 posted on 10/27/2005 8:31:54 AM PDT by Wolfstar (The reactionaries' favorite short list are all judges GWB appointed to the appellate bench.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]

To: Howlin
Oh, they "won" this round; but I'm not sure they realize what the "prize" is going to be.

You don't get it.

No one "won" anything. This was bad all the way around. Starting with the President's decision.

It just seems to get worse with him.

To win, I think were all going to have to wait until 08. And at this rate, were going to need a damn good candidate, and a lot of luck.

1,622 posted on 10/27/2005 8:36:04 AM PDT by Black Tooth (The more people I meet, the more I like my dog.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1352 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson