Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Chicago: If you can't take the smoke, get out of the bar
Chicago Flame ^ | 10-03-05 | Michaelia Fosses

Posted on 10/27/2005 4:12:30 AM PDT by SheLion

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last


1 posted on 10/27/2005 4:12:34 AM PDT by SheLion
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Just another Joe; Madame Dufarge; MeeknMing; steve50; Cantiloper; metesky; kattracks; ...

2 posted on 10/27/2005 4:12:52 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

I'll bump it!


3 posted on 10/27/2005 4:15:16 AM PDT by Jet Jaguar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

We have the same thing going on in the Columbus area. The ban passed last year, and now all the suburbs are having their own little votes set up. I am a non-smoker who really hates to breathe in cigarette smoke, but I still plan to vote against the ban. I think this has less to do with clean air than it does to keep regulating what people should be able to figure out for themselves.


4 posted on 10/27/2005 4:20:40 AM PDT by Ohioan from Florida (The only thing necessary for the triumph of evil is for good men to do nothing.- Edmund Burke)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Remind me to plan the annual Chicago boondogle with my extended group of friends to another city. We can spend our disposable cash somewhere else! I hope many other folks do the same.


5 posted on 10/27/2005 4:27:37 AM PDT by CSM (When laws are written, they apply to ALL...Not just the yucky people you don't like. - HairOfTheDog)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Ohioan from Florida

We have the same thing going on in the Columbus area. The ban passed last year, and now all the suburbs are having their own little votes set up. I am a non-smoker who really hates to breathe in cigarette smoke, but I still plan to vote against the ban. I think this has less to do with clean air than it does to keep regulating what people should be able to figure out for themselves.

Maine forced a complete ban as well, last year.  It's not fairing too well.  At least, the smaller bars and restaurants aren't fairing too well, let's put it that way.

If a business owner wants smoke free, that should be left up to him and his patrons.  And not nanny government.  Nanny government didn't put blood, sweat and tears into a business.  Yet, they are allowed to go in and dictate how the owner is to run it?   Totally disgusting.


6 posted on 10/27/2005 4:37:38 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies]

To: All
Businesses Harmed by Smoking Bans - across the US
7 posted on 10/27/2005 4:40:28 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: CSM
Remind me to plan the annual Chicago boondogle with my extended group of friends to another city. We can spend our disposable cash somewhere else! I hope many other folks do the same.

When Bloomberg made NYC smoke free, the Japanese businessmen went nuts.  They wanted to find another city in which to come and hold their meetings.  I often wonder how that turned out.

As for smokers vacationing in a smoke free place, why go and pay for that personal abuse?  I sure won't!  Like Bill O'Reilley says "Boycott the darn place!"  Take our money someplace where all people's are accommodated.

8 posted on 10/27/2005 4:43:51 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: All
This deserves reposting:

http://www.theage.com.au/articles/2004/11/13/1100227634938.html?from=storylhs

"The regulars at Brian's bar agreed. The talk that night last week had been of the front-page picture on the New York Post. It was a close-cropped head-shot of a young GI in Fallujah, face smeared with fatigue and camouflage paint, and a daub of what on closer examination was revealed to be a splatter of dried blood down the bridge of his nose.

The face of battle - yes, but it wasn't the 10,000-yard stare of eyes fresh from combat that had the regulars' attention. It was the just-lit cigarette dangling from the soldier's lips. AdvertisementAdvertisement

"So that's how it works," quipped Brian. "Shoot a fookin' sand goblin, win a fookin' fag."

The regulars chuckled, as Americans always do at that imported word, which means gay, and only gay, on this side of the Atlantic. But they got his drift, and one of the patrons wondered if the soldier and his M-16 might not find fruitful employment on New York's home front.

"Mr Mayor, you son of a bitch," he began, making a gun with index finger and upraised thumb, "you're dead." Then, in defiance of the Big Apple's draconian smoking laws, he exhaled a plume of ostentatious rebellion towards the yellowed ceiling. "Fook you, Mr Michael Bloomberg," added Brian."


9 posted on 10/27/2005 4:44:08 AM PDT by monkapotamus
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Thanks for the post!

I am a nonsmoker who believes that the proprietor of a business has the right to determine whether or not to permit smoking.

The market will respond to what consumers want. If there is a demand for nonsmoking restaurants, let it be by the choice of the owners of the restaurants. If there's a demand for smoking restaurants, then let the owners make that determination.

Freedom does not mean freedom from.


10 posted on 10/27/2005 4:46:15 AM PDT by saveliberty (I did not break the feed. I may have lost it, but I did not break the feed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Quite unbelievable for an "old" European that there is something like a "smoke ban". Really a different world. As an non-smoking architekt I had to share my office with colleagues who smoked about 40 to 50 (meanwhile banned because of their high nicotin-rate) French cigarettes. Nobody asked me if I tolerate that or not. I have to say that it was my own decision to work there. Therefore I had no problem with all that smoke although I would not tolerate it today. In the meantime I am my own boss anyway and I have nobody to ask.

:-)


11 posted on 10/27/2005 4:55:16 AM PDT by Atlantic Bridge (O tempora! O mores!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

BUMP


12 posted on 10/27/2005 4:58:20 AM PDT by fanfan (" The liberal party is not corrupt " Prime Minister Paul Martin)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Too much common sense, although common sense seems to be in short supply these days.


13 posted on 10/27/2005 5:04:06 AM PDT by metesky (This land was your land, this land is MY land; I bought the rights from a town selectman!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
The market will respond to what consumers want. If there is a demand for nonsmoking restaurants, let it be by the choice of the owners of the restaurants. If there's a demand for smoking restaurants, then let the owners make that determination.

Freedom does not mean freedom from.

There has always been room enough for everyone.  You said it well.  Thank you!

14 posted on 10/27/2005 5:06:24 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

:-) Thank you for the great post and the kind words.


15 posted on 10/27/2005 5:13:55 AM PDT by saveliberty (I did not break the feed. I may have lost it, but I did not break the feed.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

Although I try to avoid blanket indictments, it's becoming more true everyday that when democrats are in charge, your liberty will be taken away. They have completely embraced the fascist tenet that government should control private property for the Marxist "common good." Where the notion came from that a private business is public property I can't find. It's something that seeped up from the communist sewer and is now embraced by majorities in areas controlled by democrats.

The rat party has become dangerous and needs to be confronted.


16 posted on 10/27/2005 5:26:40 AM PDT by sergeantdave (Member of Arbor Day Foundation, travelling the country and destroying open space)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: sergeantdave
The rat party has become dangerous and needs to be confronted.

It's not just the rats, sergeant. There are plenty of those that call themselves conservative that will go along also. They may be CINOs or RINOs but in some cases it's the Republicrats enacting smoking bans and the DemoncRATS opposing them.

17 posted on 10/27/2005 5:50:18 AM PDT by Just another Joe (Warning: FReeping can be addictive and helpful to your mental health)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: saveliberty
:-) Thank you for the great post and the kind words.

You sure are welcome.  It's nice to have a fellow FReeper come in and not try to pick arguments over this issue. :)

18 posted on 10/27/2005 6:24:05 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies]

To: SheLion

If a business owner wants smoke free, that should be left up to him and his patrons. And not nanny government. Nanny government didn't put blood, sweat and tears into a business. Yet, they are allowed to go in and dictate how the owner is to run it? Totally disgusting.

if a bar owner wants a profitable smoke free building, he needs to lobby government to ban it everywhere. we recently had this problem in my county, just the county was going to ban smoking. altho all the owners i know don't smoke, and would like smoke free bars, they knew that many people would go the extra couple miles past county lines to go somewhere to smoke. owners said make it statewide or forget it.


19 posted on 10/27/2005 6:38:07 AM PDT by absolootezer0 ("My God, why have you forsaken us.. no wait, its the liberals that have forsaken you... my bad")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: absolootezer0
if a bar owner wants a profitable smoke free building, he needs to lobby government to ban it everywhere. we recently had this problem in my county, just the county was going to ban smoking. altho all the owners i know don't smoke, and would like smoke free bars, they knew that many people would go the extra couple miles past county lines to go somewhere to smoke. owners said make it statewide or forget it.

Why of course!  If a restaurant/bar that I like to go to went smoke free and the one across the street stayed open for smokers, that is exactly where I would go to spend my money.  Surely, you don't think that I will patronize a smoke free joint spending good money when they refuse to accommodate me?!

You are talking about a level playing field.  And you are also saying that all business's must be made smoke free so this one business doesn't loose money.  Well, excuse me.  But all the rest that go non smoking will also lose a lot of revenue.  We just don't "go there anymore."

And why would the business lose money?  I thought smoke free is what everyone is screaming for!

20 posted on 10/27/2005 6:44:35 AM PDT by SheLion (Trying to make a life in the BLUE state of Maine!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-29 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson