Harriet Miers shows no signs of lucidity of thought, and her appointment to the Supreme Court is an unacceptable danger.
She should withdraw her name as soon as possible, or, if she will not do so on her own, President Bush should ask her to do it.
Cheers,
Richard F.
Why was she nominated? I was hoping for Brown.
Hi, Richard. Haven't seen anything from you in awhile.
After reading the article I see nothing to frighten me as does the author. What you call "no signs of lucidity of thought" I see as a straight forward statemtent of fact with a minimum of words. She states no conclusions of law, just outlines of the questions and where they fit in the system.
Margaret Marshall, Chief Justice of Massachusetts, was quoted in an interview as saying, "our society has decided that it is better for these controversial issues to be decided in a court...", speaking about gay marriage after making reference to abortion.
The question Miers must be asked is, "Miss Miers: Do you agree that society has decided that controversial issues are better decided in courts than through the legislative process?"