I understand your concerns, and I follow your logic. Your concerns are valid.
Where I'm at....I consider abortion so abhorrent that I don't really care how it gets overruled. That said, I think her pro-life views are significant given what they are based on. She is an evangelical, conservative Christian.
That worldview will put her in such turmoil that she will go to the text of the Constitution and see if there really is a right to an abortion written into the constitution.
I find it absolutely unfathomable ethically that liberals today are celebrating the death of the 2000th soldier in Iraq when on their doorstep lie the tiny bodies of some 40 million aborted babies.
This is the moral issue of our age, and it is the basis of any outrage that God has with our culture.
Far beyond anything else, this must be changed.
Most pro-life advocates do not grasp the nature of the legal battle.
Assume for a moment that Casey & Roe are overturned. The outcome STILL depends on the rationale used by the court (now 50 state courts instead of the Fed apparatus), and the end result might be just the same.
For a flavor of the statutory construction route for turning legislative intent and the will of the people on its head, see the Florida Supreme COurt's decisions in the 2000 election and end of life issues, and the Texas parental notification case, which is summarized, with links, at ...
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1507174/posts?page=267#267
>>She is an evangelical, conservative Christian.<<
So claims Jimmy Carter.