Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: ArmyBratproud

How can someone be indicted (if any) if they weren't the one who 'told' Robert Novak about Plame, considering that Novak is the only person who even mentioned Plame's name in print.


44 posted on 10/25/2005 9:26:22 PM PDT by Edit35
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: MojoWire
How can someone be indicted (if any) if they weren't the one who 'told' Robert Novak about Plame, considering that Novak is the only person who even mentioned Plame's name in print.

Fitzgerald long ago got permission to go well beyond investigating the original article. That is basically irrelevant at this point.

You "out an agent" and commit a crime as soon as you tell someone who doesnt have a security clearance regardless of whether they publish the story. The whole world doesnt need to know. Just one person who is not supposed to. Say a spy gets the information, are you saying it doesnt matter as long as the American public dont know?

More than likely these idiots Rove and Libby are going to get indicted for perjury. Libby in particular may have to explain how he lied to his written notes since his grand jury testimony supposedly said he heard about Wilsons wife from reporters.

61 posted on 10/25/2005 10:06:21 PM PDT by Dave S
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 44 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson