Hamas deliberately targets innocent civillians. This kind of equivolence is reprehensible. Teacher should be fired for incompetence.
Im gonna sit this discussion out because my fingers will crush through the keyboard.
One more reason to homeschool.
Yes, there were many examples of patriotic Americans detonating carts filled with explosives in town squares and markets in Colonial America. Or there will be after the Leftists get through with the textbooks.
"This is what is being taught in American High Schools: That the American colonists were just like Hamas."
Actually the article leaves it up to the reader to form his own opinion... imagine that. From the article:
"Finally, the decision on the Sons of Liberty comes down to a variation on an old saying "one man's terrorist is another man's patriot." The ultimate conclusion must be left to the individual."
Question your kids (public or home schooled) if they know what the Stamp Act was or who the Sons of Liberty were. I'd be impressed by any teen who could elaborate even a little in his answer. After you explain who the Sons of Liberty were and their role in the Revolution (only if you have to of course), ask your kid if he thinks they were terrorists or patriots. Then ask your kid what he thinks the British thought of the Sons of Liberty. You'll probably get two different answers and that's not unreasonable.
These people can call us what they wish. What they don't understand is that America is not a school yard bully. In all of our history we don't start fights "WE FINISH THEM". God Bless America and All who have protected HER. I'm not starting a fight either, so don't bring me one because I'll finish it.
I looked this up.
earlyamerica.com
origin = a.ns.interland.net
mail addr = hostmaster.interland.net
serial = 6
refresh = 3600 (1 hour)
retry = 4 (4 secs)
expire = 604800 (7 days)
minimum ttl = 900 (15 mins)
earlyamerica.com NS a.ns.interland.net
earlyamerica.com NS b.ns.interland.net
earlyamerica.com NS c.ns.interland.net
earlyamerica.com NS a.ns.interland.net
earlyamerica.com NS b.ns.interland.net
earlyamerica.com NS c.ns.interland.net
a.ns.interland.net A 64.226.28.33
b.ns.interland.net A 69.0.145.33
c.ns.interland.net A 64.77.127.42
Registrant: Make this info private
DEV Communications, Inc.
P.O. Box 11410
Bainbridge Island, WA 98110
US
Domain Name: EARLYAMERICA.COM
Administrative Contact :
Vitale, Don
dvitale@ATTGLOBAL.NET
P.O. Box 1697
Anna Maria, FL 34216
US
Phone: (941) 779-9888
Fax: (941) 779-9530
Technical Contact :
Support, Tech **
domreg@interland.com
303 Peachtree Center Avenue
Suite 500
Atlanta, GA 30303
US
Phone: 1.800.589.5060
Fax: 410.771.9507
Record expires on 15-Feb-2007
Record created on 14-Feb-1996
Database last updated on 08-Jul-2004
Domain servers in listed order: Manage DNS
A.NS.INTERLAND.NET 64.226.28.33
B.NS.INTERLAND.NET 69.0.145.33
C.NS.INTERLAND.NET 64.77.127.42
Show underlying registry data for this record
Current Registrar: NETWORK SOLUTIONS, LLC.
IP Address: 64.225.100.9 (ARIN & RIPE IP search)
IP Location: US(UNITED STATES)-WASHINGTON-ISSAQUAH
Record Type: Domain Name
Server Type: Apache 1
Lock Status: REGISTRAR-LOCK
Web Site Status: Active
DMOZ 19 listings
Y! Directory: see listings
Web Site Title: Archiving Early America
Meta Description: Discover primary source documents from
early American history--- scenes and portraits from
original newspapers, maps and writings.
Meta Keywords: American History, The Constitution,
Declaration of Independence, Bill of Rights, primary source
material, historical documents, George Washington, thirteen
colonies, Revolutionary War, original newspapers, maps,
archival documents, historical records
Secure: No
E-commerce: No
Traffic Ranking: Not available
Data as of: 07-Oct-2005
The sad fact is the author is probably a mental midget who works as a drudge at a corporate job. They don't have the concept that the Sons of Liberty were taking direct action against an unjust government. They did not want to "scare" they wanted to communicate a message.
Hamas is DESIGNED to force change by creating fear of the governered which will intimidate change.
New Internet Historical Journal Calls for Papers on Early America
A new historical journal--- The Early America Review--- is asking for submissions. Published quarterly, focus of the
publication is 18th century America---its people, issues and events. The Early America Review is an Internet-only
journal, and is not printed in a hard-copy version. The Fall edition of the magazine has just been published and is
available at no charge on the World Wide Web at http://earlyamerica.com/review/
As publisher, I believe this journal allows academics an opportunity to "spread the gospel" of early America to
interested laypersons. It also provides authors writing about this historical period an additional venue for publication of
their works. The target audience of this publication is the "informed layperson." Those individuals who do not as a
matter of fact read historical journals, but who appreciate and, indeed, welcome an in-depth study on a variety of
subjects relative to 18th century America.
We note that in an article in the February 1996 issue of the American Historical Review, the point is made that of "the
approximately 250 manuscripts that are submitted to the AHR each year" only one-tenth of those are published.
Inevitably, we must assume, the remaining 225 manuscripts that are rejected move on to other historical journals for
consideration. However, it doesn't take a rocket scientist to calculate that the other important journals--- either via their
own special standards and criteria....or even by the total number of pages available for publication, can not and do not
accommodate the overflow.
Our view is that some of those papers that "don't make the cut" have sufficient broad appeal that would be of interest to
laypersons. The overwhelming and positive response to our premier issue (Summer 1996) supports this view, that
those outside the profession are interested in the original research and professional output of the community of
historical scholars. As such, I ask that you consider submitting your paper, dissertation, book review or commentary to
The Early America Review. We are not concerned that your manuscript has already seen the light of publication. While
it may have been exposed to academics in the field, doubtless it has never been seen by those outside the
profession. Which is, precisely, the audience we serve.
If you have access to the Internet, I invite you to take a look at the Review. If you wish to submit or if you have any
questions, please email to the publisher, Don Vitale at: devcom@seanet.com....or regular mail to: The Early America
Review, P.O. Box 11410, Bainbridge Island, WA 98110....or FAX: (206) 780-9450.
D.E. Vitale Publisher, The Early America Review http://earlyamerica.com/review/
Archiving Early America
The Archiving Early America web site contains a wide array of primary historical documents from the Keigwin and Mathews private collection. Copyrighted in 1997 and curated by Don Vitale, the site's resources are intended to provide a mix of information, instruction, and entertainment. The site's eighteenth century primary source material, including American newspapers, maps and writings, is accessible via an Excite for Web Servers search engine. The site is affiliated with The Early America Review: A Journal of Fact and Opinion On the People, Issues and Events Of 18th Century America. Users will also find on-line, quarterly editions of The Early America Review going back to Summer 1996, as well as the Town Crier, an active discussion forum of educators, historians, students, researchers, journalists. The site is well-organized, easy to navigate, and has a professional appearance. There is no charge for noncommercial purposes such as news reporting, classroom use or research and the site is open 24 hours a day.
Linked here. "http://www.otal.umd.edu/amst/bib.htm"
I started a thread on their forum regarding this article.
There likely some, maybe even some deliberately. That sort of thing happens in most every war, especially 18th century ones. But it wasn't a policy of the Committees of Correspondence, nor of the United Colonies (later states) in Congress Assembled.
More than a few Torys did get tarred and feathered though, as did many revolutionaries in crown loyalist areas.