[churchillbuff]

Any indictments, we are told, will be based on the "cover-up" of this non-crime. """

Not according to the federal judges who ruled on the reporters' jailing. And unlike you, me or the NY Times, they've seen Fitzgerald's evidence.

[Sam Hill]

BS.

This was from last February, when Fitzgerald was trying to throw Judy into jail for not revealing her source. All he had to do was show that she might have been able to prove that Libby had leaked Plame's name.

Guess what, Bucko? Judy said Libby wasn't her source for Plame's ID. That she got it from somebody else she can't remember. She swore to that under oarth.

Why are you dredging up in this no-longer even slightly relevant material from last February? Are you that desperate?

[Steve_Seattle]

If Fitz had slam-dunk evidence of a "serious threat to national security" nearly a year ago, what the hell is taking him so long to wrap this up? And NOTHING I've heard about this leak case suggests a "serious threat to national security." That's either overblown rhetoric from partisan judges or the real evidence and the real crime is something we haven't even heard about in the press.