Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: faireturn
Under my proposed amendment, you would not be forced to take the oath, or to have a rifle. You would forfeit your franchise to vote of course, but we can't be too picky, aye?

Why? What does my owning or not a gun have to do with my ability to vote? You don't want the government forcing you to get rid of your guns, I don't want the government forcing me to own one. Sounds like we both want the government out of it, huh? What makes you think that my not wanting to own a gun means I won't defend this country if it came to it?

40 posted on 10/21/2005 4:40:31 PM PDT by Gardener
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 37 | View Replies ]


To: Gardener
The real purpose of my proposal is to institute a 'rite of citizenship', and to make our oath of citizenship a mandatory part of exercising our right to vote.

Forget the gun part, -- would you support the rest of the concept?
49 posted on 10/21/2005 4:53:05 PM PDT by faireturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Gardener
What does my owning or not a gun have to do with my ability to vote?

If you are not willing to share in the common defense, be it against foreign enemies or domestic criminals, why should you have a say in how things are run? Heck you make one dumb decision, you are very likely to make more, at our expense

The Swiss used to require men to show up at the voting place with their rifle, or they couldn't vote. Being a nation of riflemen helped persuade Hitler not to invade Switzerland.

111 posted on 10/21/2005 9:09:54 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

To: Gardener
What makes you think that my not wanting to own a gun means I won't defend this country if it came to it?

Not owning a gun is going to make that sort of difficult, unless you want to throw spitballs at the enemy. Not being prepared, when you could be, shows a lack of commitment.

Historically, the army doesn't have a enough weapons even for it's full and part time soldiers at the beginning of a war. Also historically, folks were expected to bring their own. American gun owners even sent their privately owned weapons to England at the beginning of WW-II, to arm the home guard, only to have those same guns confiscated by the British government after the war, and destroyed rather than be returned them to those that had lent them.

BTW, Welcome to Free Republic. (Gardener Since May 12, 2005)

117 posted on 10/21/2005 9:28:33 PM PDT by El Gato
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 40 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson