Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gpapa
Yet it now seems clear--even well before her Senate hearings--that this selection has become a political blunder of the first order.

I'll let others get in before the predictable Miers maniac posts: "elitist," "WSJ's only upset Bush didn't nominate it to SCOTUS"...the usual Bush brain poop.

What is really significant about this editorial is the steady erosion of any support for the nomination in the conservative opinion-maker community. As much as Bush and his flunkies would like to pretend it doesn't make any difference, it's sinking this nomination. And the sooner, the better.

13 posted on 10/20/2005 9:47:16 PM PDT by Map Kernow ("I hold it that a little rebellion now and then is a good thing" ---Thomas Jefferson)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Map Kernow

"Perhaps Ms. Miers will prove to be such a sterling Senate witness that she can still win confirmation. But so far the lesson we draw from this nomination is this: Bad things happen when a President decides that "diversity," personal loyalty and stealth are more important credentials for the Supreme Court than knowledge of the Constitution and battle-hardened experience fighting the judicial wars of the past 30 years."

Yep.

And we see what happens when people place their loyalties in people instead of principles.


16 posted on 10/20/2005 9:50:48 PM PDT by flashbunny (What is more important: Loyalty to principles, or loyalty to personalities?)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 13 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson