Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Appeals court upholds Seattle's use of race in school admissions
AP ^ | 10/20/5 | Gene Johnson

Posted on 10/20/2005 12:23:48 PM PDT by Crackingham

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last
To: Crackingham
We conclude that the district has a compelling interest . . . (fill in as needed)

I really despise the term "compelling interest". It is a blank check for judicial activism. In this case, judicial racial discrimination. The judiciary has no more business determining the racial balance of schools than the state legislature or local government.

21 posted on 10/20/2005 1:05:21 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome
The more things change . . .

1960's and 70's. Emanations and penumbras.

1990's to date. Compelling state interest.

Translation: We the black robes say it is so and to hell with you, your representatives and Constitutional government.
22 posted on 10/20/2005 1:11:17 PM PDT by Jacquerie (Democrats soil institutions)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: MooseMan

I thought it was named for Franklin Pierces' VP Wm Rufus King.


23 posted on 10/20/2005 1:12:48 PM PDT by rahbert
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 19 | View Replies]

To: Jacquerie

"Constitution? We doan need no stinkin' Constitution!"


24 posted on 10/20/2005 1:17:53 PM PDT by dynachrome ("Where am I? Where am I going? Why am I in a handbasket?")
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 22 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

race,race,race,race,race,race,diversity,race,race,money,race,race,racket,race,race,.....


25 posted on 10/20/2005 1:50:55 PM PDT by samadams2000 (Nothing fills the void of a passing hurricane better than government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: rahbert

It was changed to honor MLK a few years ago.
http://www.metrokc.gov/exec/mlk/motion.htm
MOTION NO. 6461

A MOTION setting forth the historical basis for "renaming" King County after the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., instead of William Rufus DeVane King for whom King County is currently named.


26 posted on 10/20/2005 1:52:40 PM PDT by MooseMan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 23 | View Replies]

To: dynachrome

And who knows what Harriett Miers' view is on Affirmative action.


27 posted on 10/20/2005 2:16:19 PM PDT by zendari
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

Ninth Circuit.

Big surprise.

Yawn.


28 posted on 10/20/2005 3:07:28 PM PDT by linkinpunk
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: zendari
And who knows what Harriett Miers' view is on Affirmative action.

I posted it a few days ago. This is a major reason I went from undecided to strongly opposed. Here is the thread.

http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502612/posts

29 posted on 10/20/2005 4:52:45 PM PDT by freespirited
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham
public universities may consider the race of applicants in their admissions process, as long as other attributes are considered and race is not an overriding factor.

I'd like to see a private business try to use that reasoning, "Yeah, we consider race as a criterion to hire more white engineers because it's a compelling interest for us, but it isn't an overriding factor".

Bam!

30 posted on 10/20/2005 5:49:22 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: PresidentFelon
During one stretch of twenty-five consecutive cases handled by the ninth Circus Court of Appeals, twenty three of those decisions were reversed by the Supreme Court.

The bad news is that we now have two new justices who are, at best, wildcards, and most likely will vote with the liberals.

31 posted on 10/20/2005 6:03:50 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 20 | View Replies]

To: Wally_Kalbacken

Even if this point system is banned, they will just find another way to cheat:


Orwellian "diversity essay" replaces simple race preferences

The University of Michigan's undergraduate school has come out with a new admissions procedure to replace the old point system--declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gratz v. Bollinger--under which 20 points were automatically granted to members of racial minorities. The key element of the new system, as explained by Peter Wood, is a "diversity essay," in which the applicant discusses some life-changing experience which showed to him the supreme importance of diversity in his life. Wood offers some all-too-realistic parodies of the sorts of racial epiphanies that students might describe--or rather invent--in order to pass muster.

http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001772.html


32 posted on 10/20/2005 6:13:43 PM PDT by Dan Evans
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 9 | View Replies]

To: Crackingham

The 9th circus has already been overruled on this once. Does anyone remember the Bakke case against the Univ. of Calif.??


33 posted on 10/20/2005 6:18:16 PM PDT by taillightchaser
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-33 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson