Posted on 10/20/2005 12:23:48 PM PDT by Crackingham
I really despise the term "compelling interest". It is a blank check for judicial activism. In this case, judicial racial discrimination. The judiciary has no more business determining the racial balance of schools than the state legislature or local government.
I thought it was named for Franklin Pierces' VP Wm Rufus King.
"Constitution? We doan need no stinkin' Constitution!"
race,race,race,race,race,race,diversity,race,race,money,race,race,racket,race,race,.....
It was changed to honor MLK a few years ago.
http://www.metrokc.gov/exec/mlk/motion.htm
MOTION NO. 6461
A MOTION setting forth the historical basis for "renaming" King County after the Reverend Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., instead of William Rufus DeVane King for whom King County is currently named.
And who knows what Harriett Miers' view is on Affirmative action.
Ninth Circuit.
Big surprise.
Yawn.
I posted it a few days ago. This is a major reason I went from undecided to strongly opposed. Here is the thread.
http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/1502612/posts
I'd like to see a private business try to use that reasoning, "Yeah, we consider race as a criterion to hire more white engineers because it's a compelling interest for us, but it isn't an overriding factor".
Bam!
The bad news is that we now have two new justices who are, at best, wildcards, and most likely will vote with the liberals.
Even if this point system is banned, they will just find another way to cheat:
Orwellian "diversity essay" replaces simple race preferences
The University of Michigan's undergraduate school has come out with a new admissions procedure to replace the old point system--declared unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court in Gratz v. Bollinger--under which 20 points were automatically granted to members of racial minorities. The key element of the new system, as explained by Peter Wood, is a "diversity essay," in which the applicant discusses some life-changing experience which showed to him the supreme importance of diversity in his life. Wood offers some all-too-realistic parodies of the sorts of racial epiphanies that students might describe--or rather invent--in order to pass muster.
http://www.amnation.com/vfr/archives/001772.html
The 9th circus has already been overruled on this once. Does anyone remember the Bakke case against the Univ. of Calif.??
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.