Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: A Ruckus of Dogs
I am not confused at all, normally logic flows from general to specific, but that is okay, we can simply jump to specific, ignoring the general. Let's find out who is confused.

Let's use the more specific example that you have given which applies only to religion.

You are making the claim that if God allows a child to be born into a family with a certain religion, then God must not have a problem with that religion or He would not allow the child to be born into a family of that religion.

Is this your point? Please clarify where I am mistating your viewpoint so that I may understand it clearly enough to test it.

381 posted on 10/21/2005 10:31:16 AM PDT by gratham pitt (Veritas vos lierabit)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 380 | View Replies ]


To: gratham pitt
You've got it, Gratham!

Most monotheists beleive that it is only God who can endow the body with the soul. So if God is opposed to non-monotheistic religions, why would he send souls into babies that he knows are going to be raised as pagans?

382 posted on 10/21/2005 10:36:36 AM PDT by A Ruckus of Dogs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 381 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson