Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: js1138

Ok, maybe I'm out of date here. I thought radioactive decay was a result of the structure of the relevant isotope?

Of course I learned this back when there were all these little planetary systems called hydrogen, helium etc..
In addition, chemistry was almost as opaque to me as calc.


387 posted on 10/20/2005 7:39:05 AM PDT by From many - one.
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 372 | View Replies ]


To: From many - one.
Ok, maybe I'm out of date here. I thought radioactive decay was a result of the structure of the relevant isotope?

The rate of decay for any given isotope is certainly a product of structure, but the decay of an individual atom is not caused by any prior event. This has been one of the most heavily investigated phenomena in science. There are other quantum phenomena that appear to be inherently random, not just "looks like" random.

Of quantum theory could be wrong. Room for a Nobel Prize here.

404 posted on 10/20/2005 8:43:37 AM PDT by js1138 (Great is the power of steady misrepresentation.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 387 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson