Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: mlc9852

"No university is gonna go against Darwin just as very few scientists are willing to risk their funding by stating that maybe, just maybe Darwin is wrong. Thank goodness for homeschooling."

I'm sorry, but that just makes no sense at all. And I'm not sure that homeschooling on the university level is a very good idea.

It would sort of be like breast-feeding a 6-year-old. Doable, but pretty wierd.


34 posted on 10/19/2005 7:47:57 AM PDT by MineralMan (godless atheist)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 10 | View Replies ]


To: All
Another tidbit from this story: Some call design a step toward balance:
During cross examination Tuesday, plaintiffs’ attorney Eric Rothschild questioned Behe about an article Behe wrote in a journal called “Biology and Philosophy” where he combined his ideas on intelligent design and a belief in God.

Rothschild characterized intelligent design in the writings as a “God-friendly” theory.

But Behe maintained he was writing from a philosophical standpoint.

All of this is aimed at fitting the school board's actions within the Lemon test. Behe isn't helping his cause.
36 posted on 10/19/2005 7:54:51 AM PDT by PatrickHenry (No response to trolls, retards, or lunatics)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 34 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson