We see animals ever day.... carnivores that go into water... but don't hunt fish. Don't swim out to sea.... aren't part reptile part giant bird. Would you agree that there is not a shred of evidence beyond the foot prints as to what this new friend really was or what it looked like?
"We see animals ever day.... carnivores that go into water... but don't hunt fish. Don't swim out to sea.... aren't part reptile part giant bird."
I am sure you had a point but just forgot to make it.
"Would you agree that there is not a shred of evidence beyond the foot prints as to what this new friend really was or what it looked like?"
The footprints ARE the evidence. Why do you assume nothing can be learned from footprints?