[kjam22]

The scientific theory that explains how ships orbit the Earth is Orbital Mechanics, which doesn't just include the specific case of ships orbiting the Earth but ALL orbital bodies. It is a general, universal theory.

So given this level of specific... would you say that the theory / opinion / idea / speculation being advanced by this article is pretty much worthless? Does it basically say we found some foot prints that go into where we think water was 165 million years ago.... and we haven't found anything to tell us what made the prints... but we're still looking?

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"So given this level of specific... would you say that the theory / opinion / idea / speculation being advanced by this article is pretty much worthless? "

No.

"Does it basically say we found some foot prints that go into where we think water was 165 million years ago.... and we haven't found anything to tell us what made the prints... but we're still looking?"

No.

[CarolinaGuitarman]

"So given this level of specific... would you say that the theory / opinion / idea / speculation being advanced by this article is pretty much worthless? "

No.

"Does it basically say we found some foot prints that go into where we think water was 165 million years ago.... and we haven't found anything to tell us what made the prints... but we're still looking?"

No.

[kjam22]

Does it basically say we found some foot prints that go into where we think water was 165 million years ago.... and we haven't found anything to tell us what made the prints... but we're still looking?

I think the problem becomes ... if you're a researcher.... and you release information like this in the way I've stated it.... no one cares. But if you can somehow embellish that a little... then you maybe get to do the speaking circuit deal? Is that a fair guess on my part?