Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: cksharks; sinkspur; Cboldt

I believe they care about facts. They are sincere in their fears. If there are any on the dark side who are just doing it for the fun of it, they must be a very small few.

I disagree with their conclusions (to some degree, obviously since I'm still on the "wait-and-see" team), but I do think in their own misguided way they are doing what they think is best for what they believe in.

If we lose that, then we really will be lost. I think that is what Rush is trying to say when he talks about this issue -- we are debating not becuase we have competing political agendas, but because we have wildly divergent views of how to accomplish the task.

OK, now I've got a whole nuther thread to read. I was looking forward to a relaxing evening watching football.


222 posted on 10/17/2005 7:29:32 PM PDT by CharlesWayneCT
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 52 | View Replies ]


To: CharlesWayneCT
... we are debating not becuase we have competing political agendas, but because we have wildly divergent views of how to accomplish the task.

Yes. And that debate is not going on, because the eyes are on Miers, the nominee. ANd one side of that "trusts," and honest trust cannot be compromised, ergo, no discussion. Question trust, and viola, you are disloyal, etc.

You and I have swapped enough notes. Loyalty and the GOP and I goes two ways. ANd I hold pretty high expectations for forthright and honest dealing.

Thanks for the kind words. They mean alot.

229 posted on 10/17/2005 7:51:38 PM PDT by Cboldt
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson