To: bourbon
" I think you can pretty well assume that if she supports the Griswold decision she also supports its rationale."
Even the justices that vote together don't always have the same rational, sometimes they even issues separate opinions.
207 posted on
10/17/2005 6:42:41 PM PDT by
gondramB
(Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
To: gondramB
Correct. But Miers saying that she supports Griswold means that she supports the majority opinion (i.e. the controlling opinion). She didn't say, "I support Black's dissent or Harlan's concurrence."
209 posted on
10/17/2005 6:50:30 PM PDT by
bourbon
(It's the target that decides whether terror wins.)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson