Replies

Can you seriously argue that a mind unashamed to publicly write junior high school level prose is qualified to be on the most elite court of this nation ?

I've read her notes. That is nothing more than writing unimportant items while being preoccupied with other matters. Let's see what Mark Levin had to say about her in an interview with Hugh Hewitt:

ML: (laughing) Hugh, you're trying. I love you, brother. But that's irrelevant to me. I'm not interested in the statistics of three prior justices, where they come from. That doesn't inform me at all. I mean, William O. Douglass served in the SEC, and he came out of Washington, too. I mean, it doesn't matter to me. Here's what I want you to help me with. I want to feel, taste, see her judicial philosophy. I don't want to hear about all the wonderful job she did. Let's assume that she's a competent attorney, okay? That's a given. There's no question about that.

HH: A very good competent attorney?

ML: I don't have idea. Everybody tells me she's a good, competent attorney.

That is nothing more than writing unimportant items while being preoccupied with other matters.

Nothing a lawyer says or writes is unimportant. These are people trained to use language with great precision. Like diplomats.