Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: BeHoldAPaleHorse
Which, ironically, would be iron-clad cause for termination of your parental rights, because flight always has and always will demonstrate guilty intent.

Yes, it's amazing what assumptions can be made when presuming guilt before innocence, eh?

228 posted on 10/18/2005 6:00:57 AM PDT by Capagrl (Liberal - a person so open-minded their brain has fallen out)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 222 | View Replies ]


To: Capagrl
Yes, it's amazing what assumptions can be made when presuming guilt before innocence, eh?

This is a message board, not a court of law. And nobody is presuming guilt, we are just not presuming innocence either.

232 posted on 10/18/2005 6:33:11 AM PDT by Rodney King (No, we can't all just get along.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

To: Capagrl

Investigators are not there to presume innocence; that is the role of the court. The investigator is there to ascertain facts. This email is very careful to avoid giving out much in the way of hard fact, and the emailer's tactics seem to be very carefully aimed at avoiding prison time as opposed to actually protecting his family.

Flight to avoid investigation has always been viewed as a sign of guilt from the first days of the Republic. It is a case of actions speaking louder than words.


272 posted on 10/18/2005 9:06:39 AM PDT by BeHoldAPaleHorse (MORE COWBELL! MORE COWBELL! MORE! MORE! (CLANK-CLANK-CLANK))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 228 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson