Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: KarlInOhio

You make a false assumption, that the material of the star would be evenly ejected and have no clumping.


91 posted on 05/28/2006 12:24:13 PM PDT by MHGinTN (If you can read this, you've had life support from someone. Promote life support for others.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies ]


To: MHGinTN
You make a false assumption, that the material of the star would be evenly ejected and have no clumping.

There wouldn't be any clumping at all. Imagine a Fusion Nuclear blast 10 times the scale of our sun. The blast wave would eject the particles in an even manner and disperse them quickly. Even if there was 'clumping', that would be diminished quickly in our atmosphere unless the 'clumps' were very large to make them asteroid size which would be even more catastrophic than even what this article is suggesting.

Type la supernovae would be the most dangerous if close enough to the earth because they arise from dim (almost black) white dwarf stars. For there to be any effect on the earth they would have to happen fairly close to the earth. 25-50 light years away. At that distance, they may deplete the ozone layer, but would even need to be closer than that for higher radiation and particle bombardment on the scale that this article is suggesting.
102 posted on 08/20/2006 3:29:18 PM PDT by lmr (You can have my Tactical Nuclear Weapons when you pry them from my cold dead fingers.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 91 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson