Replies

You could have learned the information yourself had you called the school and asked. But, you don't like to deal with facts and reality.

You've made a number of bizarre and false statements. You've received a number of corrections throughout the thread to the false statements you've made.

You started with:
"I think the principle has over reacted."

You thought he over reacted, then you chided him for not doing enough.

"If what I have seen is true the school must be subsidized by the church.The tuitions are ridiculosly low.I saw $7600."

You received a correction concerning the tuition and found the school was not subsidized.

"I would suspect that families that are renting $20,000 houses for kids parties are tipping the church and in effect stealing the subsidized tuition from the church."

Quite an accusation.

>Please don't start the socialism ore Marxist stuff that has nothing to do with this<

#340 - And then this statement where you equate the Catholic Church with socialism and Marxism:
"Uh! That comment makes no since.The Church is already doing that by lowering the price of the education.All I suggested is charge a market rate and help the church members not the heathens getting a "free ride"."

Your post 257,"but they still need to answer for why a school affiliated with the church allows its student body to participate in drinking parties at any point in the year.If you are going to call yourself a Parochial School or a Christian School"

"Allows its student body to participate in drinking parties"...I don't remember seeing the principal stating that.

I've posted some of your more unusual and disparaging remarks. You could have saved yourself some embarrassment had you taken the time to simply do a little research and check your facts.

But, as you've shown, you have no desire for the truth.

Your above posts clearly show your anti-Catholic bias.

Your posts and your thought processes are quite bizarre...

Some soul-searching and prayer on your part is in order...

>You've made a number of bizarre and false statements. You've received a number of corrections throughout the thread to the false statements you've made.

You started with:
"I think the principle has over reacted." <

Now you are just making things up because your argument is week.Never said >

You received a correction concerning the tuition and found the school was not subsidized.
this.<

Recieved no such correction but I checked Web site the Tuition is actually lower $6100.This is not possible without class size of 100 or subsidized tuition.

>#340 - And then this statement where you equate the Catholic Church with socialism and Marxism:
"Uh! That comment makes no since.The Church is already doing that by lowering the price of the education.All I suggested is charge a market rate and help the church members not the heathens getting a "free ride"." <

If you had bothered to read thread rather than take quotes out of context you would have noted this was a reply to a charge I was promoting Marxism.The poster apoligized in a subsequent post and said it was aimed at others.

>Allows its student body to participate in drinking parties"...I don't remember seeing the principal stating that. <

When Brother Kenneth washed his hands of the problem he gave tacit approval to the activities outside of sschool.Failure to take action by disciplining students who involve themselves in these parties meets any definition of allow.

You have made multiple charges against me that are either out right fabrications as shown above or just a purposefull twisting of my words.Please provide 1 piece of proof that the school disciplines students for off-campus activities or just admit you don't believe a Christian School should expect the students to adhere to a moral code to attend.