Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: camle
I felt the same way you did.

It seems to me like he found the sex/booze/drugs technically wrong, but he was willing to tolerate that. Kids will be kids, after all.

It was the display of wealth that horrified him. That always seems to be the breaking point for the class warfare crowd, then they backtrack and tack on the other grievances just too look less petty.

33 posted on 10/17/2005 7:35:56 AM PDT by dead (I've got my eye out for Mullah Omar.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies ]


To: dead

thank you.

I also have a feeling that the reporter highlighted the lurid aspects of the story.


39 posted on 10/17/2005 7:37:19 AM PDT by camle (keep your mind open and somebody will fill it full of something for you.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

To: dead

The display of wealth IS bad when you are talking about teeangers. In fact, I believe its bad when you're talking about anyone "displaying" wealth. No, I'm not saying that government should prevent people from displaying their wealth, but I do think its a serious moral failing just like the sex and booze.


166 posted on 10/17/2005 8:44:33 AM PDT by dinoparty
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 33 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson