Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Special Report: Judith Miller Exonerates Bush Officials
GOP USA ^ | October 17, 2005 | By Cliff Kincaid

Posted on 10/16/2005 11:17:47 PM PDT by Nasty McPhilthy

click here to read article


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last
To: Nasty McPhilthy
I agree with everything Kincaide said. What I don't understand is that Matthews, CNN,FOX,MSNBC, CBS,NBC,ABC, and all of their mouthpieces, even today, after the Miller piece is printed, come out with exactly the opposite of what Kincaide states. They say, "White HOuse braces for Upcoming Bush Administration Incictments". Never mind that the main reporter who just spent 85 days in jail went to the grand jury and exonnerated Libbey/Rove. Yet the MSM has become more frenetic in their exuberent pronouncements that Libby is going down.

And here I ask myself, "I must be a dumbass, because it looks like their allegations of Libby just fell apart, but all of the NYT, Time magazines Fineman, and all of the rest are like elk in a frenzied rut, just about the stick it to the administration. I keep reading and concluding the same thing, and they keep writing and repeating the same thing. Both are 180 degrees out of phase from one another". Who is living in fantasy land?

21 posted on 10/17/2005 6:54:26 AM PDT by Texas Songwriter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Texas Songwriter

As I understand Miller's version of events, she said she "couldn't remember" whether Libby mentioned Plame's name. I don't see how you get a conviction out of "I can't remember" from the key witness. The MSM is salivating over nothing.


22 posted on 10/17/2005 8:00:33 AM PDT by Steve_Seattle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 21 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

I am of the opinion that miller never had a source to begin with. I don't think novak did either. The "source" is " I do not recall". To me that is a cop out.

I think the media hounds decided to print information they THOUGHT was right and had nothing to back it up but "anonymous sources". Furthermore, I think they printed ( or were going to print) other information they knew or thought to be false in an attempt to get tuthful information.

I believe in the right to speak. However, I think accountability is needed. I for one am SICK AND TIRED of anonymous sourcing. If there is no source named, then I think the writing or the reporting needs to be in the OP ED section and NOT the NEWS section.

If anonymous sourcing is further protected, we will see MORE false reporting not more truthful reporting.

The MSM has made their bed and the last couple years have shown many people the light. Dan rather....I thank you for helping that (LOL).

I think that this whole "Rove"..."Cheney"...."White house" investigation was a HUGE DUCK MISSION that is a direct result of POOR journalism standards.


23 posted on 10/17/2005 8:19:11 AM PDT by BlueStateDepression
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Hope it gets widely distributed It won't simply because the MSM will do NOTHING to exonerate the Bush Admin; they have only one goal: assist the Demonrats in impeachment.
24 posted on 10/17/2005 8:40:19 AM PDT by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: ReaganRevolution

They might go to jail yet. The talk is that they could go for inconsistencies in their stories to the GJ. Can't get 'em on one thing, go for the next. How else do you justify the cost of a special prosecutor?


25 posted on 10/17/2005 8:54:52 AM PDT by twigs
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
Miller says the following about Fitzgerald's line of questioning: "Mr. Fitzgerald asked me whether Mr. Libby had mentioned nepotism. I said no."

Very interesting comment. Wilson mentioned nepotism in his October 5 MTP interview.

RUSSERT: Was there a suggestion that this was cronyism, that it was your wife who had arranged the mission?

WILSON: I have no idea what they were trying to suggest in this. I can only assume that it was nepotism. And I can tell you that when the decision was made, which was made after a briefing and after a gaming out at the agency with the intelligence community, there was nobody in that room when we went through this that I knew.

I wonder if Wilson is the source for the "nepotism" allegaton.

26 posted on 10/17/2005 9:00:48 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kabar

Why was the CIA not concerned that Plame outed herself to Wilson during a "heavy makeout session" on their third date?


27 posted on 10/17/2005 9:04:53 AM PDT by massgopguy (massgopguy)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 26 | View Replies]

To: massgopguy

Or that Wilson outed himself by saying in his NYT article that he was sent by the CIA.


28 posted on 10/17/2005 9:14:37 AM PDT by kabar
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy
None of this crap wouldn't be happening had Bush cleaned house and purged the CIA, FBI, and State Departments from Clinton/liberal holdovers.
29 posted on 10/17/2005 9:24:48 AM PDT by Extremely Extreme Extremist (Harmful or Fatal if Swallowed)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Senator Kunte Klinte
Judith Miller's claim that she can't recall who first told her that Joe Wilson's wife was Valerie Plame (a.k.a. Victoria Flame) is not credible. A reporter will always remember an initial source when subsequent information received is used to confirm, deny or crosscheck against the original revelation.

Nevertheless, Miller and the Times can be believed on their GOP exoneration. They would never go to jail to obstruct an investigation so as to protect a Republican source since their whole editorial strategy has been to find and publish embarrassing material to damage or destroy the Bush administration and to suppress all contrary information on Democratic corruption, Kerry's dishonorable discharge, WMD and Iraq, Able Danger data mining, Air America and the Gloria Wiese scandal, Louis Freeh on Clinton's graft, etc.

If da glove don't fit, ya gotta acquit.

30 posted on 10/17/2005 9:27:31 AM PDT by OESY
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: Nasty McPhilthy

The CIA - FB&I - DEA - BATF - NSA - NEA - FOB we'd be better off without the whole group.


31 posted on 10/17/2005 9:33:20 AM PDT by sandydipper (Less government is best government!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: petercooper
But Billy Kristol has been wetting his pants talking about "several" high level White House staffers that are going to be indicted.

Bill Kristol wants to see Rove and Libby indicted and marched off in handcuffs even more than the leftists do. Anything that harms George Bush only enhances his man, John McCain.

Kristol's ultimate wet dream - one day in mid 2007, John McCain and some of his RINO friends make a trip to the White House, to tell an embattled George Bush, facing articles of impeachment from the democrat controlled House of Representatives, that he doesn't have any support in the Senate, and that he needs to resign "for the good of the country."

32 posted on 10/17/2005 9:33:36 AM PDT by CFC__VRWC ("Anytime a liberal squeals in outrage, an angel gets its wings!" - gidget7)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 18 | View Replies]

To: Extremely Extreme Extremist

....and we have a Winner


33 posted on 10/17/2005 9:54:01 AM PDT by fhlh (Polls are for strippers and liberal spin.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 29 | View Replies]

To: cynicom
Anyone that is stupid enough to talk off the record to NYT reporters needs to be fired.

Yes, this is the real long-term lesson here. I hope the reporters realize that they have cut their nose to spite their face.

One of these days, I hope to see reporters actually REPORT news, not try to create it, interpret or analyze it.

34 posted on 10/17/2005 10:59:20 AM PDT by TravisBickle
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies]

To: p23185
Hope it gets widely distributed It won't simply because the MSM will do NOTHING to exonerate the Bush Admin; they have only one goal: assist the Demonrats in impeachment.

Send links to the article to all your friends by e-mail. With the internet, the MSM no longer has control over distribution of news.

35 posted on 10/17/2005 3:42:25 PM PDT by Rocky (Air America: Robbing the poor to feed the Left)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies]

To: Rocky
Send links to the article to all your friends by e-mail. With the internet, the MSM no longer has control over distribution of news.

Believe me I do. But as impossible as it sounds I still have some rellies that do not have, or refuse to use, the internet and consequently still believe EVERYTHING they see on the alphabet news networks.

36 posted on 10/17/2005 3:56:28 PM PDT by p23185
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 35 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first previous 1-2021-36 last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson