Replies

Are you on crack or something?

Given how affective your response is, I think I'm dead on target.

You don’t have a CLUE how conservative I am, and what all I’ve done actively for the Republican party, but you presume to suggest I’m a closet liberal. Go find something I’ve said here that would suggest that and post it here for all to see. If you can’t do that, then shut up and grow up.

I think your previous post makes it clear enough that you don't really consider yourself to be a part of the conservative grassroots:

"I just wish that conservatives would wait until there is something concrete to fire at Miers about."

You refer to conservatives as a group you have nothing in common with and with whom you are not associated. And I suspect that is true. What I can't figure out is why you want to hide it so badly. There are, after all, plenty of Bushbots and party-over-principle folks here at FR who will welcome you with open arms. It's not as though you'll get booted for flying under your true colors.

As for the much ballyhooed notion of waiting until Miers has testified, that's a lot like waiting to find out the result of the Senate confirmation vote. By that time, it's likely to be too late, particularly given how many GOP senators voted to confirm the nomination of the chief counsel of the ACLU, Ruth Buzzi Ginsberg, to the Court during the Clinton regime. And a mistake with Miers may not be corrected for years or decades to come. Or perhaps ever. Bush may get no more nominees. And if a Dim gets the WH in '08 and holds it for two terms, it would be during the 2016-2020 term when we might next get a chance.

Your obvious complacence to such a dangerous outcome, one that can nullify everything conservatives have fought for since the Reagan era (and even before) indicates to me that you really don't care much whether Miers is the justice we need, no matter the consequences to an agenda that conservatives have worked for decades to enact.

I don't know how dull-witted a person can possibly be to see that this is, as it was always said to be, the single test of whether it was worth installing a second Bush administration. If we don't get strict constructionist justices on the Court, then having elected Lyndon Johnson to his third and fourth terms as president will have been an exercise in futility for conservatives in the Republican party.

You again accuse me of having no conservative values but can't back it up. You're a typical no name internet nobody. I don't have to justify anything by you, I KNOW what I've done in my life dealing with politics and what I believe. Some nobody like you with a mouth and a keyboard doesn't change that. Insults are a poor excuse for facts, and that's all you do. You're people skills suck and you're the typical emotional poor debater. You can't debunk any facts I put forward so as is the typical way of the intellect challenged, you resort to insults and name calling. The fact that you claim to be a conservative, then go off attacking other conservatives, is really disappointing since I have always believed that on the whole, conservatives were of a higher quality than you appear to be. There are exceptions to every rule, and now I believe you're one of the emotional immature trolls that many users warned me about on here. People like you aren't even worth talking to.