The most primary issue-the most primary issue is will they strictly interpret the Constitution of the United States?
I am waiting for the hearings...I don't find Kristol, Coulter, Will, etc. compelling at all.
The hearings will show us that Ms. Miers can hide her judicial philosophy well. The Ginsberg rule serves that function. The hearings will be a window into her intelligence and ability to compose answers on the fly.
I found the Kristol, Coulter and Will pieces to be seriously lacking (at best), and Coulter's little more that a "Will on speed" with too many insults thrown in. It (all of them, not just Coulter) is really too bad, becuase this is a serious subject that deserves being approached with due respect, but not with blinders.