[Soul Seeker]

And, yet, you apparently ignore the slights tossed at conservative commentators in this thread. Apparently are oblivious to your own derogatory comment labaling those in dissent as 'puritans'. And ignore someone disagreed with that assessment of Dobson. Namely myself, to whom it was directed.

Nice try attempting to discredit those in opposition, but your narrowed focus cannot deny the sum commentary of the thread.

[CharlesWayneCT]

I used to use the term "anti-miers", but some suggested that was negative. So I'm trying other names, I thought puritan would be a good name but both sides complained about me using it, the pro-miers people because it was too nice, and you suggesting it was a negative.

Would "purist fanatics" be better. :->

I hate to use the term 'other side' when talking with fellow conservatives. What is the shorthand we can use for those who want Miers to withdraw?

I don't personally care what I am called -- kool-aid drinker, bushbot, whatever. Not very polite, but I choose not to be upset. Anyway, I like kool-aid, and I trust Bush when he says it isn't poisoned.

[CharlesWayneCT]

And for the record, your response was:

I don't have issue with Dobson

I did not read that as a repudiation of his impolite personal attack on the man.

You said he had a right to be in politics, but that would be true even if you agreed that he was a moron.

So I think it is unfair to chastise me for complaining about a personal attack on a man who said nothing but what he believed, who attacked nobody here.