I think your point was that the Democratic Party is a bunch of compromisers. The simple fact is that they control the Democratic Party in a way that the Conservatives do NOT control the Republican Party. In any case. you are leaving the religious conservatives out, are you not?
Where did I make this point?
The simple fact is that they control the Democratic Party in a way that the Conservatives do NOT control the Republican Party.
I believe I acknowledged that in my recitation of what Liberals support that finds voice in no less then Durbin's, the second highest ranking Dem member of the Senate, voice while the recitation of what conservative's support is constantly fighting to find a voice within the Republican party.
In any case. you are leaving the religious conservatives out, are you not?
I have no clue what point you are trying to make. Though, I would suggest the term "pro-life" does denote some reference to those of a religious persuasion.
The POINT of my post was to take exception to the linkage of conservatives to the Howard Dean's of the Democrat Party by pointing out what conservatives favor and what Liberals favor. There is no comparison. Not only in terms of one controlling the party and another not which I didn't argue against, but in manner that one ideology is harmful to this country while the other is not.
Conservatives would like to be the main voice of the Republican Party, absolutely Truthful. But pro-Life, Pro- adherance to Constitution, pro-Defense, pro-troops, pro-taxes, pro-smaller government etc...is not on the same plane as pacifists linked with encouraging our enemy to continue to fight while undermining our Constitution, creating dependence on government for need and raising taxes to feed the giant.