"Did they describe him as a friend to imply that Miller is covering for him?"
I don't know their motive. But for Scooter's sake let's hope it's not true.
I don't think it's true. I just think the press is disa-
pointed.
The headlines are deceptive. It seems that the serious questions which are raised are, 'why did the Times spend millions of dollars on defending this woman', and 'why did she not go along with the Times to get the Bush Administration'.
I don't get a lot of other information from this article.