Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: Dr. Eckleburg

Would Toledo grant a permit to the KKK?




Yes. Yes they would. And to Farrakhan, and to the Black Panthers, and any other groups just as detestable as the Neo-Nazis. It's called the Constitution, you might try reading it.

You and I don't have to like it, but it is a right.


110 posted on 10/15/2005 11:56:31 AM PDT by trubluolyguy (It didn't have to be Mr. President. It just didn't have to be.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 49 | View Replies ]


To: trubluolyguy
From my post 65...

Exceptions established by the courts to the First Amendment protections include the following: Defamation; Causing panic; Fighting words; Incitement to crime; Sedition; Obscenity.

Fighting words: In the famous case of Chaplinsky v. New Hampshire, the U.S. Supreme Court held that the First Amendment does not protect "fighting words -- those which by their very utterance inflict injury or tend to incite an immediate breach of the peace." (315 U.S. 568, 572 [1942])

Note that the harm involved is physical harm caused by someone else who was provoked by the speaker whose speech is being suppressed. The fact that someone else flies into a rage and causes physical harm results in justifying suppression of speech by another person.

It is simply not a cut-and-dried issue.

120 posted on 10/15/2005 12:01:27 PM PDT by Dr. Eckleburg ('Deserves' got nothing to do with it.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 110 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson