I'm not challenging her assertion but indicating that an assertion like hers without hard data is the same as Bush asking us to trust him. What I am irritated about is the poor salesmanship of the effort to appoint Miers. All of the data supporting her should have been in the forefront as her nomination was made.
If I did any research it would be to prove her assertion to be correct, because I would like Bush to come out of this smelling like a rose.
I got an idea---you do the friggin' research.
Seems to me that the moderator has got his/her/or it's values kind of screwed-up. OR, you're just a bigger whiner than harpu.