To: JohnHuang2
Attack Bauers. Attack Buchanan. Attack Kristol. Attack everyone else who questions nominating an unqualified political crony to serve as an Associate Justice of the Supreme Court of the United States. Make a humorous stab at listing some qualifications that Miers may possess and that's it?
I've agreed with so much you've posted here but I'm not with you on this one. Weak! But that's all anyone has in support of Miers. Weak evidence that she is somehow qualified and a plea to trust George Bush.
8 posted on
10/14/2005 3:43:32 PM PDT by
Spiff
(Robert Bork on the Miers Nomination: "I think it's a disaster on every level.")
To: Spiff
All Miers' critics at this point asking us to trust THEM.
12 posted on
10/14/2005 3:47:00 PM PDT by
Carolinamom
(Weeping may endure for a night, but joy cometh in the morning......Psalm 30:5)
To: Spiff
"Attack everyone else who questions nominating an unqualified political crony."Why don't you square off, mano a mano, with Harriet Miers in a Courtroom, and let's see who is qualified to post a legal opinion (or an opinion on someone's qualifications to issue a legal opinion) and who is not?
My money is not on you.
58 posted on
10/14/2005 6:33:59 PM PDT by
Luis Gonzalez
(Some people see the world as they would want it to be, effective people see the world as it is.)
To: Spiff
unqualified political crony The RAT talking point since Katrina. Using terms like that is a sure fire way to win over converts to your position, if in fact you really care all that much. /s
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson