Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: gondramB

"So I think your argument is that because we buy so much from overseas relative to how much we sell then we can have tarrifs without fear of retaliation."

My argument is that just because we impose fines on a percentage of trade with a given country does not mean we cannot thus claim to be advocates of free trade. The fact is that trade with Canada has boomed over the past decade+, with the United States consuming all but a minority of Canadian exports. Our markets are incredibly open to their goods, and compared to most other nations our barriers/fees on exports from other nations are small.


25 posted on 10/14/2005 3:56:00 PM PDT by Sandreckoner
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 17 | View Replies ]


To: Sandreckoner

I'd argue the tariffs are significant. And the net result is just the same as a tax. The American government collects the money home buyers pay more. But this is worse than a tax because it does everything a tax does plus invites retaliation.


"The 12.6 percent duty will be added to the 19.3 percent tariff put on Canadian softwood lumber in August"

"The U.S. lumber industry had been pressing for tariffs, saying they're needed to save jobs, while opponents say they will drive up prices of wood products for U.S. consumers. An economist for a homebuilders group says the two tariffs would add about $1,500 to the price of an average home."

http://forests.org/archive/canada/imwoodta.htm


26 posted on 10/14/2005 4:28:13 PM PDT by gondramB (Conservatism is a positive doctrine. Reactionaryism is a negative doctrine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 25 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson