Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


1 posted on 10/14/2005 4:26:11 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies ]


To: neverdem; Lando Lincoln; quidnunc; .cnI redruM; yonif; SJackson; dennisw; monkeyshine; Alouette; ...


    Victor Davis Hanson Ping ! 

       Let me know if you want in or out.

Links: FR Index of his articles:  http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/keyword?k=victordavishanson 
His website: http://victorhanson.com/     NRO archive: http://www.nationalreview.com/hanson/hanson-archive.asp

2 posted on 10/14/2005 4:27:15 AM PDT by Tolik
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
"The result of this petrified leadership is that while things are not nearly as bad as they seem, the public in its frustration feels they are far worse."


"Petrified leadership" and the continual onslaught of the petrified MSM propaganda machine.



3 posted on 10/14/2005 4:39:16 AM PDT by G.Mason
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

This too shall pass. (Thanks for posting VDH. He puts it in a nutshell.)


5 posted on 10/14/2005 4:41:16 AM PDT by hershey
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

This angst has far less to do with leadership and far more with a culture of bad media, negative public stereotypes, and an unhealthy addiction to 'getting more stuff'.


7 posted on 10/14/2005 4:55:33 AM PDT by finnman69 (cum puella incedit minore medio corpore sub quo manifestu s globus, inflammare animos)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
Hanson sums up by observing:

" --- the fatalism of a normally can-do public grows. Voters no longer trust once tight-fisted Republicans to balance the budget, while the old war party of Wilson, Roosevelt, Truman and Kennedy is no longer credible on national security.
The voters want to both expand traditional domestic energy sources and to curtail consumption, but the two horn-locked parties see these solutions as either/or rather than compatible.

The result of this petrified leadership is that while things are not nearly as bad as they seem, the public in its frustration feels they are far worse. -- "

The time is ripe to throw out lock-horned republocrat 'leaders'.

I wonder who Hanson would like to see step forward..

8 posted on 10/14/2005 4:55:45 AM PDT by faireturn
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

Nice article.


10 posted on 10/14/2005 5:00:01 AM PDT by Sam Cree (absolute reality)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

I am pretty sure this gas spike is here to stay, and that it may be partially driven by our voracious apetite for energy

The larger part of the spike is driven by the voracious apetite for profit by gas producers ,oil companies and speculators.

I know ---I know-- bring on the lovers of high gas prices telling me they can sell for anything they like.Its Capitolism.Its economics. Thats all well and good, They have the Gold Mine , we get the shaft.


12 posted on 10/14/2005 5:10:14 AM PDT by sgtbono2002
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik

save


13 posted on 10/14/2005 5:22:18 AM PDT by Eagles6 (Dig deeper, more ammo.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
Usually such angst — less than half the population expresses confidence in the administration — would lead to the opposition's advantage. It hasn't, as the Democrats are offering no systematic alternative to meet the growing anguish.

Pollsters need to do a better job of discerning the true reasons behind falling presidential confidence instead of just parroting socialist left talking points about the higher price of gasoline. For instance, my sole source of discontent with Bush lies with his nomination of Miers.
20 posted on 10/14/2005 7:08:47 AM PDT by Milhous
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
True, Republican-endorsed tax cuts have led to more net federal revenue in 2005 than in 2001. Yet — even with the unanticipated costs of the 9/11 attack, the ongoing war and Hurricane Katrina — if the Bush administration had kept entitlement spending to Bill Clinton's levels (with small increases for inflation), we would today have a balanced budget and a small surplus.

*sigh*

Instead, 2001-2005 marked the wildest growth in nondiscretionary domestic outlay in our recent history. Even with an expanding economy, vast amounts of new federal income could not keep pace with even more vast expenditures.

**Big sigh**


22 posted on 10/14/2005 7:41:26 AM PDT by Red Boots
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

To: Tolik
"...the two horn-locked parties see these solutions as either/or rather than compatible...The result of this petrified leadership is that while things are not nearly as bad as they seem, the public in its frustration feels they are far worse. "

While this may indeed be true, I think that it a natural response to the lifting of the information monopoly that the MSM has held for so long.  With new, opposing sources of news, information and opinions available, many of us are questioning and rejecting "commonly-held beliefs" that we had accepted (albeit with some conflicting feelings and free-floating suspicion) in the past.  This has lead to a healthy difference of opinion and political fractiousness, but which can cause anxiety and frustration in those who are not comfortable with questioning the status-quo (which pretty much requires abandoning "political correctness", since PC is a means to squelch any meaningful exchange of ideas.)

26 posted on 10/14/2005 10:04:16 AM PDT by SuzyQue (Remember to think.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson