Well that is a statement of the obvious. And in this case
we agree that the Senate should have its hearing and vote.
Bush is very much like Lincoln harried on all sides carrying out the fight to save the Union doing what he believes to be right all the while alledged supporters are chopping him off at the knees.
And the Miers nomination will in no way diminish his legacy. Once again assuming he is wrong is not convincing those who trust the man.
And assuming he is right is not convincing to those who do not worship him...(Or Lincoln for that matter)
Time will tell. As for my opinion, and you ake this personally please, there is no reasoning with blind trust. I have given up trying to convince you of anything - but aim to conclude our relationship on a civil note.
To say that tehre is no reasoning with blind trust is not an attack. Blind trust, or "faith" as it is sometimes called, is just not amenable to reason. That is the nature of faith. I have faith that Jesus Christ is my Lord and Savior. That he suffered and was killed to attone for my failure to live up to God's Commandments. That all I need it faith in him and his promise, and I will have the undeserved gift of everlasting life, given by the grace of God, who is all knowing, all powerful, and all loving.
No amount of reasoning with me will cause me to lose my faith in Jesus Christ. And no amount of reasoning with you will cause you to lose your faith in George Bush.
I am not saying that you see George Bush as a god. Don't go there. I am saying that it is literally impossible to mount a reasoned argument against "trust." And you have erected that barrier to reasoned discussion.