Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article

To: justshutupandtakeit

It's hard to consent to a person who has no applicable record. This is the nexus of the delimma.

Look, forget about whether the opponents of Miers are right and you are wrong or vice verse. Recognize the political reality that these opponents are core base voters just like you and they are numerous and growing in quantity. Even if you like Miers' record and think she's a dandy pick, please recognize that a large segement of our base vote does not and likely will not. I have yet to see a single person opposed to the pick, who has been persuaded by any of the arguments advanced by the WH. All I'm asking, is you consider the implications for this. Elections didn't come to an end in 2004 and Bush is not the last president we'll ever have.


382 posted on 10/13/2005 9:27:35 PM PDT by empirekin768
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 356 | View Replies ]


To: empirekin768

Miers has a fine record and certainly meets any qualification posed by the Constitution.

I stick to the Constitution not some ultra ultra imagination.


401 posted on 10/13/2005 9:34:34 PM PDT by justshutupandtakeit (Public Enemy #1, the RATmedia.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

To: empirekin768

"All I'm asking, is you consider the implications for this. Elections didn't come to an end in 2004 and Bush is not the last president we'll ever have."
__________________________________________________________

Presidents come and go, Supreme court justices last a lifetime.


427 posted on 10/13/2005 9:45:33 PM PDT by tennmountainman
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 382 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
News/Activism
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson