So if you believe that all people who smoke MJ are stupid then it must be true---correct?
"Even If I gave you his name, I cannot here in this forum prove that a nobel laureate smoked weed."
So, your unprovable statement is not valid argument.
"I have no reason to lie."
Prove you have no reason to lie. Why should I believe that?
"So if you believe that all people who smoke MJ are stupid then it must be true---correct?"
Our tete-a-tete is not about what I believe, but about your specious argument to justify MJ use by citing its daily use by an anonymous Nobel Prize winner in Physics.
I mocked your argument by citing my witless woeful acquaintance. But, of great relevance and consequence, is the fact that 6million elementary school aged children are prescribed Ritalin on the orders of public school administrations. Ritalin is also used/abused illegally for "recreational" psychotropic purposes.
The far reaching consequences of legalizing drugs, as well as using psychotropic meds without Rx, is not addressed by specious arguments nor by faux studies supporting a radical political agenda.
By far reaching consequences I mean perhaps irreversible consequences which adversely affect social order, mental stability, and genetic viability of humankind in the near future.
I find it very ironic that zealous environmentalists freaked-out by enumerable pollutions assaulting our environment ignore the toxic pollution of drugs and Rx Meds which alter normal physiological chemistry.
I've heard that one before!